This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0540032 , Plum Point Community Water Assn
22 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 237 samples on record.
The other 35 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 237 samples on record, detections range from August 25, 2004 to March 24, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 151 of 153 results | Jun 30, 2005 | Nov 18, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 139 of 153 results | Jun 30, 2005 | Nov 18, 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 23 of 23 results | Nov 29, 2004 | Feb 10, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 23 of 23 results | Nov 29, 2004 | Feb 10, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Nov 15, 2004 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 10 results | Nov 15, 2004 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 17 results | Sep 5, 2007 | Mar 24, 2026 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 14 results | Oct 22, 2025 | Mar 24, 2026 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 10 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 18 results | Mar 29, 2006 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 2 of 4 results | Jun 26, 2012 | Sep 17, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 2 of 2 results | Sep 28, 2011 | Dec 6, 2011 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Mar 24, 2026 | Mar 24, 2026 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Mar 25, 2025 | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Mercury 1035 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Oct 23, 2019 | Oct 23, 2019 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Sep 18, 2019 | Sep 18, 2019 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 1 of 2 results | Dec 6, 2011 | Dec 6, 2011 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 1 of 2 results | Sep 28, 2011 | Sep 28, 2011 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Mar 20, 2006 | Mar 20, 2006 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Apr 11, 2005 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Apr 11, 2005 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Aug 25, 2004 | Aug 25, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 171–180 of 237 samples, newest first — collected February 8, 2010 to August 30, 2010. The summary above covers all 237.
27 results from the 10 samples listed here: 15 detected, 12 not detected. Across the whole record it is 383 of 903. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.64 mg/l , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.64 mg/l , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2273 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.008 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.6782 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1496 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0044 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 1.5159 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0047 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 3.7817 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.014 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0044 mg/l , sample collected Mar 29, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 29, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100831-102NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.64 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.64 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100622-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100622-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-049PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2273 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.008 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-048PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.6782 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-047PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1496 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0044 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 1.5159 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0047 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-045PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 3.7817 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.014 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 29, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100330-004PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0044 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100209-016CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).