This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0540072 , North Panola Water District
24 of the 56 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 290 samples on record.
The other 32 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 290 samples on record, detections range from April 4, 2002 to December 22, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 118 of 118 results | Oct 4, 2004 | Dec 11, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 76 of 118 results | Oct 4, 2004 | Dec 11, 2024 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 24 of 24 results | Jul 26, 2004 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Dec 7, 2022 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Dec 7, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 20 of 21 results | Jul 26, 2004 | Jun 25, 2024 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 18 results | Oct 19, 2006 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 15 of 18 results | Oct 19, 2006 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 15 of 18 results | Oct 19, 2006 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 14 of 18 results | Oct 19, 2006 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 14 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Dec 29, 2020 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 14 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Dec 29, 2020 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 14 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Dec 29, 2020 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 22 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Mar 9, 2015 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 22 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Mar 20, 2006 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 10 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Aug 30, 2012 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 14 results | Aug 11, 2009 | Sep 25, 2017 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 22 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Dec 21, 2020 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 14 results | Aug 11, 2009 | Sep 25, 2017 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 25 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Aug 23, 2004 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 25 results | Apr 4, 2002 | May 14, 2003 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 38 results | Oct 27, 2021 | Oct 27, 2021 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 22 results | Nov 24, 2014 | Nov 24, 2014 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 22 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Apr 11, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 131–140 of 290 samples, newest first — collected February 10, 2010 to June 22, 2010. The summary above covers all 290.
33 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 22 not detected. Across the whole record it is 415 of 1,382. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.5508 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.3048 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0088 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0169 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.3674 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 2.39 ug/l , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.39 ug/l , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 2.46 ug/l , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.46 ug/l , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100624-053PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.5508 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100624-052PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.3048 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100624-051PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0088 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100624-047PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0169 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100624-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.3674 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.39 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.39 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.46 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.46 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-026CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).