This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0570039 , Fernwood Industrial Water Supp
9 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 30 samples on record.
The other 4 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 30 samples on record, detections range from July 10, 2007 to July 12, 2017. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 20 of 20 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Jul 12, 2017 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 20 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Jul 12, 2017 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 5 results | Sep 5, 2007 | Dec 6, 2016 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 5 results | Jun 30, 2010 | Dec 6, 2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 4 results | Aug 27, 2013 | Dec 6, 2016 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 4 results | Aug 27, 2013 | Dec 6, 2016 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 4 results | Aug 27, 2013 | Aug 27, 2013 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 4 results | Aug 27, 2013 | Aug 27, 2013 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 4 results | Aug 27, 2013 | Aug 27, 2013 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 21–30 of 30 samples, newest first — collected July 28, 2004 to June 30, 2010. The summary above covers all 30.
28 results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 19 not detected. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 5, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0043 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0014 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0038 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0005 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0048 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0082 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100701-016TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Sep 5, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070906-017HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Sep 5, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070906-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-164PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-165PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0043 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0014 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-161PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0038 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0005 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-162PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0048 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-163PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0082 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 28, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040729-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 28, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040729-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).