This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0570050 , Sanderson Farms LLC
16 of the 52 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 259 samples on record.
The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 259 samples on record, detections range from November 24, 2003 to March 4, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 172 of 172 results | Jun 24, 2004 | Aug 10, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 172 results | Jun 24, 2004 | Aug 10, 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 20 of 20 results | Nov 29, 2004 | Mar 4, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 20 of 20 results | Nov 29, 2004 | Mar 4, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 16 of 16 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Apr 9, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 13 of 16 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Apr 9, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 16 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Apr 9, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 16 results | Mar 15, 2004 | Mar 27, 2006 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 16 results | Mar 15, 2004 | Feb 12, 2024 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 16 results | Oct 30, 2023 | Feb 12, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 19 results | Jun 28, 2010 | Aug 26, 2013 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 19 results | Sep 10, 2007 | Jun 28, 2010 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Mar 29, 2022 | Mar 29, 2022 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 13 results | Aug 26, 2013 | Aug 26, 2013 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Apr 11, 2005 |
| Mercury 1035 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Apr 11, 2005 | Apr 11, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 111–120 of 259 samples, newest first — collected June 29, 2009 to June 28, 2010. The summary above covers all 259.
26 results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 17 not detected. Across the whole record it is 282 of 984. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0085 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0074 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0082 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.008 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0079 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0073 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0075 mg/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 28, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100629-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 28, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100629-014TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- May 12, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100513-018CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-030PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0085 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-029PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0074 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-028PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0082 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-025PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.008 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-024PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0079 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-023PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0073 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090630-022PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0075 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).