This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0580007 , Randolph Water Association #1
11 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Randolph Water Association #1.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 1–10 of 11 samples, newest first — collected September 4, 2007 to August 19, 2025.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 1 not detected. Those samples also carried 20 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 4.7 ug/l , sample collected Aug 19, 2025 13:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025 |
|
||
| 8.72 ug/l , sample collected Jun 12, 2024 14:05, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024 |
|
||
| 11.2 ug/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2023 14:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023 |
|
||
| 1.76 ug/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2022 14:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022 |
|
||
| 3.49 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2021 15:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 |
|
||
| 2.01 ug/l , sample collected Dec 14, 2020 14:15, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020 |
|
||
| 1.53 ug/l , sample collected Aug 8, 2016 03:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 30, 2013 03:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 31, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 4, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 19, 2025 13:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-250820-004
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 4.7 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 12, 2024 14:05
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-240613-005
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 8.72 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2023 14:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-230817-017
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.2 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2022 14:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-220623-004
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.76 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2021 15:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-211103-010
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.49 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Dec 14, 2020 14:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 201215-021TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 2.01 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 8, 2016 03:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 160809-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 1.53 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 30, 2013 03:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131031-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 31, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100901-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Sep 4, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070905-025TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).