Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0590002 ·, Big V Water Association

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 341–350 of 383 samples, newest first — collected March 27, 2006 to September 6, 2007. The summary above covers all 383.

21 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 10 not detected. Across the whole record it is 383 of 1,853. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Sep 6, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-377PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0862 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0005 mg/l

• Collected

  Sep 6, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-376PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0762 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0021 mg/l

• Collected

  Sep 6, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-154PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.3095 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 6, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-151PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.2608 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0005 mg/l

• Collected

  Sep 5, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-155PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0356 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 4, 2007

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res.time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070905-030HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 4, 2007

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res.time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070905-029TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

• Collected

  Aug 30, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-153PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0096 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Aug 30, 2007

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070907-152PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0152 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Mar 27, 2006

  Sampling point

  TF082 Treatment TF082

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060328-006CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    Not detected below 0.005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).