This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0610026 , SW Rankin Water Association #1
126 samples have been analysed for TTHM at SW Rankin Water Association #1.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 91–100 of 126 samples, newest first — collected November 29, 2010 to February 28, 2013.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 1 not detected. Those samples also carried 39 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 98.2 ug/l , sample collected Feb 28, 2013 11:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2013 – Mar 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 58.5 ug/l , sample collected Nov 6, 2012 12:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 100.7 ug/l , sample collected Aug 22, 2012 01:35, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012 |
|
||
| 141 ug/l , sample collected May 3, 2012 02:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012 |
|
||
| 45.1 ug/l , sample collected Feb 13, 2012 01:50, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2012 – Mar 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 56.1 ug/l , sample collected Nov 29, 2011 01:20, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 12, 2011 02:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 108 ug/l , sample collected May 17, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 34.3 ug/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 29, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Feb 28, 2013 11:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 130301-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2013 – Mar 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 98.2 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 6, 2012 12:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 121107-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 58.5 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 22, 2012 01:35
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120823-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 100.7 ug/l
-
- Collected
- May 3, 2012 02:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120504-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 141 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 13, 2012 01:50
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120214-014TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2012 – Mar 31, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 45.1 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 29, 2011 01:20
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111130-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 56.1 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 12, 2011 02:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110913-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 17, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110518-012TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 108 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 1, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110302-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 34.3 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 29, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101130-011TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).