Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0610026 ·, SW Rankin Water Association #1

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 351–360 of 445 samples, newest first — collected November 2, 2009 to February 3, 2010. The summary above covers all 445.

61 results from the 10 samples listed here: 25 detected, 36 not detected. Across the whole record it is 751 of 1,979. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.

• Collected

  Feb 3, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF081 Treatment Plant T081

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100204-075IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001517 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.000944 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    0.342 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Feb 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  SM2 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100202-044HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Feb 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  SM1 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100202-043HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Feb 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  SM2 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100202-044TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    1.02 ug/l

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    1.02 ug/l

• Collected

  Feb 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  SM1 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100202-043TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Nov 17, 2009

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091118-016HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.004 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.023 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.009 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0.03 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

• Collected

  Nov 17, 2009

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091118-016TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    39.6 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    39.6 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

• Collected

  Nov 2, 2009

  Sampling point

  SM2 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091103-024HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.004 mg/l

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.012 mg/l

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.01 mg/l

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0.02 mg/l

• Collected

  Nov 2, 2009

  Sampling point

  SM1 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091103-023HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.004 mg/l

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.011 mg/l

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.01 mg/l

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0.02 mg/l

• Collected

  Nov 2, 2009

  Sampling point

  SM2 Location withheld

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091103-004TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    50.7 ug/l

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    1.29 ug/l

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    51.99 ug/l

Routine (10).