Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0640001 ·, Boggan Ridge W/A

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 131–140 of 192 samples, newest first — collected June 1, 2009 to April 13, 2011. The summary above covers all 192.

59 results from the 10 samples listed here: 4 detected, 55 not detected. Across the whole record it is 182 of 921. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Apr 13, 2011

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110414-001NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 22, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100923-002NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 22, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100923-001NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 15, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100916-015VO

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010

  • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

• Collected

  Jul 8, 2010

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100709-003TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Jul 8, 2010

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100709-003HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Mar 24, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100325-029CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Feb 10, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100211-042IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.018222 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.000564 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Jun 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090602-078NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090602-077NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).