This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0640007 , City of Mendenhall
24 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 165 samples on record.
The other 34 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 165 samples on record, detections range from September 10, 2002 to November 12, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 64 of 64 results | Aug 17, 2007 | Sep 5, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 31 of 64 results | Aug 17, 2007 | Oct 8, 2020 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 22 results | Jun 16, 2004 | Apr 7, 2025 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 22 results | Jun 16, 2004 | Apr 7, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 20 results | Sep 17, 2007 | Nov 12, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 15 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Nov 12, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 22, 2003 | Mar 24, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Oct 22, 2003 | Mar 24, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 15 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Aug 20, 2024 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Aug 2, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Aug 2, 2012 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Aug 2, 2012 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 10 results | Apr 10, 2006 | May 8, 2019 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 15 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Aug 20, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 18 results | Jul 7, 2010 | Oct 13, 2020 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Sep 19, 2019 | Dec 12, 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 12 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Oct 13, 2020 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | May 8, 2019 | May 8, 2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 12 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Sep 26, 2016 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 12 results | Sep 26, 2016 | Sep 26, 2016 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Feb 8, 2010 | Feb 8, 2010 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 10, 2006 | Apr 10, 2006 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Oct 22, 2003 | Oct 22, 2003 |
| P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Sep 10, 2002 | Sep 10, 2002 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 121–130 of 165 samples, newest first — collected September 17, 2007 to July 7, 2010. The summary above covers all 165.
39 results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 29 not detected. Across the whole record it is 215 of 797. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 7, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 24, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0203 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 2.1 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 1.9 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 2, 2010 08:20, sampling point TF080 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 21, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 21, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 21, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1 mg/l , sample collected Nov 27, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| 0.1 mg/l , sample collected Nov 27, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 27, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Jul 7, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100708-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 7, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100708-010HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Mar 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100325-021CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100209-026IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0203 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- 2.1 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Feb 2, 2010 08:20
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- B090010272
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- 1.9 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091022-012NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 27, 2008
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081028-027NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Nov 27, 2007
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 071128-089NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.1 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.1 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 17, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070918-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 17, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070918-030TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Routine (10).