This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0640021 , Shivers Water Association
20 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 241 samples on record.
The other 37 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 241 samples on record, detections range from October 27, 2003 to July 21, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 59 of 59 results | Aug 14, 2007 | Aug 10, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 38 of 59 results | Aug 14, 2007 | Aug 10, 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 25 of 42 results | Jun 16, 2004 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 25 of 42 results | Jun 16, 2004 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 18 of 18 results | Oct 27, 2003 | Mar 24, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 26 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 18 results | Oct 27, 2003 | Jan 12, 2021 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 26 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 10 of 10 results | Mar 22, 2012 | Oct 4, 2012 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 18 results | Dec 7, 2006 | Mar 24, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 20 results | May 13, 2009 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 20 results | May 13, 2009 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 21 results | May 13, 2009 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Sep 19, 2019 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 21 results | May 13, 2009 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 18 results | Oct 27, 2003 | Jan 10, 2024 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 18 results | Dec 7, 2006 | Jan 12, 2021 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 40 results | Dec 11, 2006 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 20 results | Nov 5, 2009 | Nov 5, 2009 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 21 results | May 13, 2009 | May 13, 2009 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 181–190 of 241 samples, newest first — collected May 13, 2009 to November 5, 2009. The summary above covers all 241.
48 results from the 10 samples listed here: 21 detected, 27 not detected. Across the whole record it is 268 of 1,574. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.004 mg/l , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Nov 5, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 12.5 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.38 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 13.88 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 16.6 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.8 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 18.4 ug/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.012 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.008 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.013 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Aug 11, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 1.17 mg/l , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| 1.17 mg/l , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Nov 5, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091106-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.004 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Nov 5, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091106-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Aug 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090812-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 12.5 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.38 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 13.88 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090812-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 16.6 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.8 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 18.4 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090812-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.012 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090812-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.008 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.013 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 3, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090604-070NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 3, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090604-069NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 3, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090604-066NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 1.17 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 1.17 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 13, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090514-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).