Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0650004 , Town of Mize

35 of the 74 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 209 samples on record.

The other 39 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 209 samples on record, detections range from October 27, 2003 to July 21, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Town of Mize, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 60 of 60 results Aug 28, 2007 Jul 25, 2023
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 33 of 60 results Aug 28, 2007 Jul 25, 2023
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 23 of 23 results Oct 27, 2003 Jun 23, 2026
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 21 of 21 results Oct 27, 2003 Jun 23, 2026
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 17 of 17 results Aug 16, 2004 May 13, 2026
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 15 of 17 results Aug 30, 2010 May 13, 2026
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 15 of 21 results Oct 27, 2003 Dec 3, 2019
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 12 of 14 results Sep 3, 2013 May 13, 2026
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 12 of 14 results Sep 3, 2013 May 13, 2026
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 12 of 14 results Sep 3, 2013 May 13, 2026
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 12 of 14 results Sep 3, 2013 May 13, 2026
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 10 of 14 results Sep 21, 2016 May 13, 2026
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 8 of 8 results May 12, 2009 Jul 21, 2026
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 5 of 10 results Dec 15, 2011 Jul 18, 2012
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 42 results Jun 14, 2004 May 28, 2020
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 42 results Jun 14, 2004 May 28, 2020
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 20 results Apr 10, 2006 Dec 3, 2019
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 21 results Apr 10, 2006 Feb 8, 2010
Calcium 1016 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Chloride 1017 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Magnesium 1031 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Manganese 1032 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Potassium 1042 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Carbon Dioxide 1901 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Color 1905 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
PH 1925 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Alkalinity, Total 1927 Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Iron, Field Result FEFD Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Calculated Sodium NACA Water Quality 2 of 2 results May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 21 results Apr 10, 2006 Apr 10, 2006
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 21 results Dec 3, 2019 Dec 3, 2019
PH, Field Result PHFD Water Quality 1 of 1 result May 12, 2009 May 12, 2009

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 151–160 of 209 samples, newest first — collected May 12, 2009 to August 30, 2010. The summary above covers all 209.

78 results from the 10 samples listed here: 43 detected, 35 not detected. Across the whole record it is 303 of 1,069. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Town of Mize, every result from 151 to 160 of 209 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Aug 30, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100831-003HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Aug 30, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100831-003TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 24, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100325-019CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 24, 2010
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100325-015CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 24, 2010, sampling point TF102 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 8, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100209-033IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0333 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.393 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 8, 2010
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100209-032IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0327 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0068 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.392 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-059NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-051NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
May 12, 2009
Sampling point
WL002 Well W002
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090513-005PC
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
8 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.66 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
0.368 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Not recorded
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.58 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.002 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.95 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
88.8 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 2.5 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
221 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
3.42 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
15 units The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Color 1905 EPA method 2120B Not recorded
30.7 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
8.39 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 PH 1925 EPA method 150.1 Not recorded
193 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Iron, Field Result FEFD EPA method 3500AL-D Not recorded
76.5 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL002 Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
Collected
May 12, 2009
Sampling point
WL001 Well W001
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090513-001PC
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
6.57 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.76 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
0.378 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Not recorded
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.26 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.002 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.6 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
80.1 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 2.5 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
209 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
3.64 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
10 units The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Color 1905 EPA method 2120B Not recorded
25.6 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
8.2 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 PH 1925 EPA method 150.1 Not recorded
194 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
0.11 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Iron, Field Result FEFD EPA method 3500AL-D Not recorded
79.5 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
8.4 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009, sampling point WL001 PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D Not recorded

Routine (10).