Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results
MS0670003 , Town of Doddsville
99 samples have been analysed for Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) at Town of Doddsville.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) result
The table below lists 71–80 of 99 samples, newest first — collected July 27, 2009 to December 8, 2011.
10 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 0 not detected. Those samples also carried 50 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.038 mg/l , sample collected Dec 8, 2011 09:40, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Sep 26, 2011 08:00, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.006 mg/l , sample collected May 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 2, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Dec 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.03 mg/l , sample collected Aug 4, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.12 mg/l , sample collected Dec 9, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.05 mg/l , sample collected Jul 27, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Dec 8, 2011 09:40
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111209-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.038 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 26, 2011 08:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110927-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
-
- Collected
- May 16, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110517-012HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110304-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Dec 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101209-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Aug 4, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100805-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.03 mg/l
-
- Collected
- May 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100521-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Mar 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100318-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Dec 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091210-006HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.12 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 27, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090728-018HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.05 mg/l
Routine (10).