Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0690008 , Oakdale Estates and Lake Suente

26 of the 63 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 120 samples on record.

The other 37 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 120 samples on record, detections range from October 29, 2003 to July 27, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Oakdale Estates and Lake Suente, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 30 of 30 results Jul 12, 2007 Aug 1, 2023
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 24 of 30 results Jul 12, 2007 Aug 1, 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 21 of 22 results Jun 14, 2004 Jul 27, 2026
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 21 of 22 results Jun 14, 2004 Jul 27, 2026
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 12 of 17 results Mar 12, 2007 Oct 4, 2022
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 12 of 17 results Aug 16, 2004 Jul 21, 2014
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 10 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 31, 2025
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 4 results Sep 24, 2019 Jul 27, 2026
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 10 results Apr 26, 2005 Mar 31, 2025
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 10 results Apr 26, 2005 Mar 31, 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 2 of 9 results Feb 3, 2009 Jul 21, 2014
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 2 of 9 results Nov 4, 2008 Jul 21, 2014
Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 Radionuclide 2 of 4 results Jun 25, 2012 Sep 12, 2012
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 2 of 9 results Feb 27, 2008 Nov 4, 2008
Calcium 1016 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 1 result May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Chloride 1017 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 1 result May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 11 results May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 3 results May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Conductivity @ 25 C Umhos/CM 1064 Water Quality 1 of 1 result May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Alkalinity, Total 1927 Water Quality 1 of 1 result May 19, 2021 May 19, 2021
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 1 of 9 results Aug 21, 2017 Aug 21, 2017
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Jul 21, 2014 Jul 21, 2014
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Jul 21, 2014 Jul 21, 2014
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Jul 21, 2014 Jul 21, 2014
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 10 results Apr 26, 2005 Apr 26, 2005
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 10 results Apr 26, 2005 Apr 26, 2005

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 91–100 of 120 samples, newest first — collected May 14, 2007 to October 15, 2007. The summary above covers all 120.

25 results from the 10 samples listed here: 16 detected, 9 not detected. Across the whole record it is 161 of 574. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Oakdale Estates and Lake Suente, every result from 91 to 100 of 120 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Oct 15, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
071016-005TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Oct 15, 2007, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Oct 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
Collected
Jul 23, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070724-008HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0133 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 Jul 1, 2007 – Sep 30, 2007
Collected
Jul 23, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070724-010TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 23, 2007, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2007 – Sep 30, 2007
Collected
Jul 16, 2007
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070717-077NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.27 mg/l , sample collected Jul 16, 2007, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
0.27 mg/l , sample collected Jul 16, 2007, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 16, 2007, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
Collected
Jul 12, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070713-101PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.8192 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Jul 12, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070713-110PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.2274 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0035 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Jul 12, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070713-108PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.7027 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0038 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Jul 12, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070713-109PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0807 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Jul 12, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070713-107PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0226 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
May 14, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070515-006HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0046 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 14, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 Apr 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007

Routine (10).