Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0700010 , Tiplersville Water Association

27 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 228 samples on record.

The other 30 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 228 samples on record, detections range from October 29, 2003 to July 14, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Tiplersville Water Association, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 60 of 60 results Aug 14, 2007 Aug 8, 2023
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 17 of 17 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 31, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 17 of 34 results Sep 11, 2007 Nov 19, 2024
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 16 of 17 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 31, 2025
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 14 of 17 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 31, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 12 of 34 results Sep 11, 2007 Feb 29, 2012
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 17 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 31, 2025
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 10 of 10 results Dec 7, 2011 Jul 12, 2012
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 6 results Sep 15, 2019 Jul 14, 2026
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 6 of 28 results Mar 16, 2009 Feb 29, 2012
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 6 of 28 results Mar 16, 2009 Mar 29, 2011
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 4 of 29 results Mar 29, 2011 Jun 4, 2024
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 60 results Aug 14, 2007 Sep 1, 2020
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 4 of 28 results Mar 16, 2009 Jul 26, 2010
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 3 of 28 results Mar 16, 2009 Nov 30, 2011
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 2 of 29 results Aug 12, 2024 Nov 19, 2024
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 2 of 28 results Nov 4, 2008 Mar 1, 2010
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 17 results Mar 29, 2004 Apr 26, 2005
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 29, 2004
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 1 of 29 results Mar 4, 2024 Mar 4, 2024
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 1 of 29 results Mar 4, 2024 Mar 4, 2024
Nitrite 1041 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 40 results May 13, 2013 May 13, 2013
Cyanide 1024 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 17 results May 11, 2011 May 11, 2011
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 40 results Apr 4, 2011 Apr 4, 2011
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 40 results Apr 4, 2011 Apr 4, 2011
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 17 results Apr 26, 2005 Apr 26, 2005
Beryllium, Total 1075 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 17 results Oct 29, 2003 Oct 29, 2003

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 171–180 of 228 samples, newest first — collected June 3, 2009 to April 5, 2010. The summary above covers all 228.

51 results from the 10 samples listed here: 18 detected, 33 not detected. Across the whole record it is 205 of 1,015. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Tiplersville Water Association, every result from 171 to 180 of 228 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Apr 5, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100406-003CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 5, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 1, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100302-036IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.206694 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.001398 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.145 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF101 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 1, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100302-002TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 1, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100302-002HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.013 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.028 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.004 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
Collected
Dec 2, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091203-016TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Dec 2, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091203-005HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.006 mg/l , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.001 mg/l , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Dec 2, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jul 29, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090730-008TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Collected
Jul 29, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090730-008HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.016 mg/l , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.009 mg/l , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.009 mg/l , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.123 mg/l , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.15 mg/l , sample collected Jul 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Collected
Jun 3, 2009
Sampling point
TF102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090604-011NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jun 3, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090604-009NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

Routine (10).