Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0710002 , Town of Burnsville

21 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 159 samples on record.

The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 159 samples on record, detections range from November 5, 2003 to June 30, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Town of Burnsville, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte	Kind	Detected in	First detected	Last detected
Copper, Free 1022	Inorganic Chemical	59 of 60 results	Aug 14, 2007	Aug 9, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456	Organic Chemical	17 of 20 results	Jul 13, 2010	Jun 30, 2026
TTHM 2950	Organic Chemical	16 of 19 results	Sep 11, 2007	Oct 14, 2025
Barium 1010	Inorganic Chemical	10 of 10 results	Nov 5, 2003	Apr 1, 2025
Fluoride 1025	Inorganic Chemical	10 of 10 results	Nov 5, 2003	Apr 1, 2025
Nickel 1036	Inorganic Chemical	9 of 10 results	Mar 29, 2004	Apr 1, 2025
Lead 1030	Inorganic Chemical	8 of 60 results	Aug 14, 2007	Aug 8, 2023
Chromium 1020	Inorganic Chemical	4 of 10 results	May 22, 2013	Apr 1, 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451	Organic Chemical	3 of 5 results	Sep 9, 2013	Jun 30, 2026
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452	Organic Chemical	2 of 5 results	Oct 26, 2020	Jun 30, 2026
Sodium 1052	Inorganic Chemical	2 of 2 results	Sep 19, 2019	Mar 28, 2023
Chloroform 2941	Organic Chemical	2 of 5 results	Sep 9, 2013	Oct 26, 2020
Sulfate 1055	Inorganic Chemical	2 of 2 results	Nov 5, 2003	Mar 29, 2004
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450	Organic Chemical	1 of 5 results	Jun 30, 2026	Jun 30, 2026
Arsenic 1005	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 10 results	Apr 1, 2025	Apr 1, 2025
Xylenes, Total 2955	Organic Chemical	1 of 7 results	Sep 26, 2022	Sep 26, 2022
Ethylbenzene 2992	Organic Chemical	1 of 7 results	Sep 26, 2022	Sep 26, 2022
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453	Organic Chemical	1 of 5 results	Oct 26, 2020	Oct 26, 2020
Dibromochloromethane 2944	Organic Chemical	1 of 5 results	Oct 26, 2020	Oct 26, 2020
Bromodichloromethane 2943	Organic Chemical	1 of 5 results	Sep 9, 2013	Sep 9, 2013
Selenium 1045	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 10 results	Mar 1, 2010	Mar 1, 2010

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 121–130 of 159 samples, newest first — collected September 11, 2007 to April 4, 2011. The summary above covers all 159.

57 results from the 10 samples listed here: 6 detected, 51 not detected. Across the whole record it is 152 of 563. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Town of Burnsville, every result from 121 to 130 of 159 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result	Analyte	Monitoring period
Collected Apr 4, 2011 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 110405-108NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 4, 2011, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 4, 2011, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 4, 2011, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected Sep 27, 2010 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 100928-162NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 27, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 27, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 27, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Sep 20, 2010 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 100921-022VO Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 20, 2010, sampling point TF080	Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Jul 13, 2010 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 100714-005TH Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Jul 13, 2010 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 100714-005HA Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2010, sampling point MRT000	Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Apr 12, 2010 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 100413-007CN Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 12, 2010, sampling point TF080	Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Mar 1, 2010 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 100302-073IN Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.185 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8	Not recorded
0.0012 mg/l , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point TF080	Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Jun 1, 2009 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 090602-005NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected Jul 28, 2008 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 080729-023NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected Sep 11, 2007 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 070912-010HA Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 11, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Collected
Apr 4, 2011

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
110405-108NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Sep 27, 2010

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100928-162NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Sep 20, 2010

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100921-022VO

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
- 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
Collected
Jul 13, 2010

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100714-005TH

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jul 13, 2010

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100714-005HA

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
  
  Result
  0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Apr 12, 2010

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100413-007CN

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
  
  Result
  Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Mar 1, 2010

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100302-073IN

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.01 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
  
  Result
  0.185 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.0008 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.0012 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 1, 2009

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
090602-005NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Jul 28, 2008

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080729-023NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Sep 11, 2007

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
070912-010HA

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
- Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).