This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0710004 , Tishomingo Co Water District
8 of the 37 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 97 samples on record.
The other 29 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 97 samples on record, detections range from August 23, 2004 to November 18, 2024. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 63 of 63 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 8, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 44 of 63 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 8, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 21 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Nov 18, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 19 results | Jun 18, 2007 | Oct 18, 2022 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Jul 7, 2008 | Oct 27, 2020 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Nov 18, 2024 | Nov 18, 2024 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Jul 5, 2011 | Jul 5, 2011 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jul 5, 2011 | Jul 5, 2011 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 71–80 of 97 samples, newest first — collected August 31, 2009 to June 13, 2011. The summary above covers all 97.
24 results from the 10 samples listed here: 19 detected, 5 not detected. Across the whole record it is 123 of 345. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0644 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.1039 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0031 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0461 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0022 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.6934 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0039 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0594 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0034 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 1.6475 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.005 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.2495 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0045 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0475 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0011 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.2521 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Jun 13, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-072PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0644 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-071PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1039 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0031 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-070PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0461 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0022 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-069PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.6934 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0039 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-068PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0594 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0034 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-067PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 1.6475 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.005 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-066PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2495 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0045 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-065PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0475 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 13, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110614-064PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2521 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 31, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090901-017HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Routine (10).