Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0710004 , Tishomingo Co Water District

8 of the 37 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 97 samples on record.

The other 29 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 97 samples on record, detections range from August 23, 2004 to November 18, 2024. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Tishomingo Co Water District, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 63 of 63 results Aug 28, 2007 Aug 8, 2023
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 44 of 63 results Aug 28, 2007 Aug 8, 2023
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 6 of 21 results Aug 23, 2004 Nov 18, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 5 of 19 results Jun 18, 2007 Oct 18, 2022
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 2 of 14 results Jul 7, 2008 Oct 27, 2020
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 1 of 16 results Nov 18, 2024 Nov 18, 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 1 of 14 results Jul 5, 2011 Jul 5, 2011
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 1 of 16 results Jul 5, 2011 Jul 5, 2011

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 81–90 of 97 samples, newest first — collected August 28, 2007 to August 31, 2009. The summary above covers all 97.

30 results from the 10 samples listed here: 17 detected, 13 not detected. Across the whole record it is 123 of 345. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Tishomingo Co Water District, every result from 81 to 90 of 97 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Aug 31, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090901-017TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 31, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jul 7, 2008
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080708-006TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Jul 7, 2008
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080708-006HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-040PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0686 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0352 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-039PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.1165 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0015 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-038PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.1326 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0043 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-037PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.8917 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0052 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-036PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0281 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0017 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-035PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0589 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0032 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 28, 2007
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070829-034PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.3505 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008

Routine (10).