This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0710004 , Tishomingo Co Water District
8 of the 37 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 97 samples on record.
The other 29 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 97 samples on record, detections range from August 23, 2004 to November 18, 2024. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 63 of 63 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 8, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 44 of 63 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 8, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 21 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Nov 18, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 19 results | Jun 18, 2007 | Oct 18, 2022 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Jul 7, 2008 | Oct 27, 2020 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Nov 18, 2024 | Nov 18, 2024 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Jul 5, 2011 | Jul 5, 2011 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jul 5, 2011 | Jul 5, 2011 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 91–97 of 97 samples, newest first — collected August 23, 2004 to August 28, 2007. The summary above covers all 97.
14 results from the 7 samples listed here: 9 detected, 5 not detected. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.1559 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.348 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0015 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1395 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0072 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0023 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 23, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 1.57 ug/l , sample collected Aug 23, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-033PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1559 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-032PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.348 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0015 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-031PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1395 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0072 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 18, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070619-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.0023 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jun 18, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070619-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Aug 23, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040824-079HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 23, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040824-050TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.57 ug/l
Routine (7).