Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0710006 , City of Iuka

15 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 157 samples on record.

The other 43 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 157 samples on record, detections range from October 29, 2003 to September 9, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for City of Iuka, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 70 of 70 results Aug 16, 2007 Sep 9, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 27 of 70 results Aug 16, 2007 Jul 20, 2022
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 18 of 21 results Jun 14, 2004 Apr 14, 2025
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 18 of 21 results Jun 14, 2004 Apr 14, 2025
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 10 results Oct 29, 2003 Apr 1, 2025
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 10 results Oct 29, 2003 Apr 1, 2025
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 10 results May 2, 2005 Apr 1, 2025
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 5 of 5 results Mar 14, 2012 Oct 9, 2012
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 3 of 17 results Jul 15, 2010 Oct 18, 2022
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 10 results May 22, 2013 Apr 1, 2025
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Oct 3, 2019 Mar 28, 2023
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 2 of 12 results Sep 19, 2007 Jul 15, 2010
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 10 results May 2, 2005 Mar 3, 2010
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 1 of 12 results Oct 27, 2020 Oct 27, 2020
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 10 results May 2, 2005 May 2, 2005

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 111–120 of 157 samples, newest first — collected June 24, 2010 to September 22, 2010. The summary above covers all 157.

46 results from the 10 samples listed here: 16 detected, 30 not detected. Across the whole record it is 177 of 617. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for City of Iuka, every result from 111 to 120 of 157 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Sep 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100923-004VO
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Sep 22, 2010, sampling point TF080 Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jul 15, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100716-003TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jul 15, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100716-003HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-010PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.9178 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0039 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-009PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.2124 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0021 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-008PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.8057 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-007PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0707 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.005 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-006PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.6837 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0042 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-005PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.8842 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0023 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 24, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100625-004PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
1.6358 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0014 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

Routine (10).