Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0710010 ·, Town of Tishomingo

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 141–150 of 195 samples, newest first — collected April 10, 2006 to June 18, 2007. The summary above covers all 195.

39 results from the 10 samples listed here: 12 detected, 27 not detected. Across the whole record it is 251 of 808. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Jun 18, 2007

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070619-019TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    1.01 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    1.01 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007

• Collected

  Nov 14, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  061115-014HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.0021 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Nov 14, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  061115-014TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

• Collected

  Aug 21, 2006

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060822-014NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    1.67 mg/l

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    1.67 mg/l

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Aug 1, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060802-008HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.0024 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Aug 1, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060802-008TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

• Collected

  Jun 27, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060628-001TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 551.1

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

• Collected

  Jun 5, 2006

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060606-024HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    0.0031 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Apr 10, 2006

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060411-038CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    Not detected below 0.005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Apr 10, 2006

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  060411-034IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.024303 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.000584 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

  • Uranium-238 4009

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

Routine (10).