Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results
MS0710029 , Short Coleman Park-Nasa Plant
100 samples have been analysed for Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) at Short Coleman Park-Nasa Plant.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) result
The table below lists 61–70 of 100 samples, newest first — collected January 11, 2010 to November 28, 2011.
10 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 0 not detected. Those samples also carried 50 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.08 mg/l , sample collected Nov 28, 2011 12:30, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Aug 23, 2011 02:10, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.052 mg/l , sample collected May 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Mar 1, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Dec 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 19, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.07 mg/l , sample collected May 18, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.03 mg/l , sample collected Jan 11, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Jan 11, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Nov 28, 2011 12:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111129-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.08 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 23, 2011 02:10
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110824-011HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- May 16, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110517-010HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.052 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 1, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110302-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Dec 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101202-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 19, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100720-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- May 18, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100519-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.07 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100302-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jan 11, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100115-010HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.03 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jan 11, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100115-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
Routine (10).