Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0710029 , Short Coleman Park-Nasa Plant

27 of the 103 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 543 samples on record.

The other 76 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 543 samples on record, detections range from October 29, 2003 to April 15, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Short Coleman Park-Nasa Plant, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 90 of 90 results Sep 28, 2004 Aug 9, 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 72 of 100 results Apr 8, 2004 Feb 4, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 66 of 100 results Apr 8, 2004 Apr 30, 2024
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 47 of 69 results Nov 16, 2006 Sep 14, 2017
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 41 of 41 results Oct 29, 2003 Feb 14, 2024
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 39 of 69 results Nov 16, 2006 Sep 14, 2017
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 38 of 63 results Jun 3, 2008 Dec 11, 2017
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 31 of 63 results Sep 8, 2008 Sep 14, 2017
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 25 of 40 results Jun 16, 2004 Apr 15, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 25 of 90 results Sep 28, 2004 Aug 9, 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 24 of 40 results Jun 16, 2004 Apr 15, 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 19 of 63 results Nov 2, 2009 Jun 6, 2018
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 17 of 69 results Jul 26, 2007 Sep 14, 2017
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 17 of 41 results Oct 29, 2003 May 2, 2017
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 14 of 41 results Apr 27, 2005 Mar 24, 2020
Dalapon 2031 Organic Chemical 13 of 25 results Feb 24, 2009 Mar 22, 2016
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 8 of 63 results Nov 3, 2008 Dec 13, 2016
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 7 of 7 results Sep 18, 2019 Mar 28, 2023
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 41 results Apr 10, 2006 Nov 3, 2008
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 41 results Nov 3, 2008 Oct 18, 2010
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 41 results Nov 15, 2004 Feb 28, 2022
Thallium, Total 1085 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 41 results Aug 31, 2009 Aug 31, 2009
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 41 results Apr 10, 2006 Nov 3, 2008
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Oct 29, 2003 Mar 29, 2004
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2042 Organic Chemical 1 of 5 results Sep 16, 2013 Sep 16, 2013
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 1 of 63 results Nov 3, 2008 Nov 3, 2008
Cyanide 1024 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 43 results Apr 10, 2006 Apr 10, 2006

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 401–410 of 543 samples, newest first — collected May 12, 2009 to July 28, 2009. The summary above covers all 543.

47 results from the 10 samples listed here: 8 detected, 39 not detected. Across the whole record it is 611 of 2,409. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Short Coleman Park-Nasa Plant, every result from 401 to 410 of 543 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Jul 28, 2009
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090729-024PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0441 mg/l , sample collected Jul 28, 2009, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 28, 2009, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Jul 13, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 SM2
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090714-018TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Jul 13, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 SM1
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090714-017TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Jul 13, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 SM2
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090714-018HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jul 13, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 SM1
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090714-017HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
TF080 TF080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-037NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
TF081 Treatment Plant T081
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-036NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF081 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF081 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF081 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-001HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-001TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
Collected
May 12, 2009 09:30
Sampling point
TF080 TF080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
200905140076
Laboratory
Eurofins Eaton Analytical
1.4 ug/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 Dalapon 2031 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 Picloram 2040 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.2 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 Dinoseb 2041 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 2,4-D 2105 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.2 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 2,4,5-TP 2110 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.04 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 12, 2009 09:30, sampling point TF080 Pentachlorophenol 2326 EPA method 515.4 Not recorded

Routine (10).