This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0730006 , City of New Albany
29 of the 60 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 710 samples on record.
The other 31 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 710 samples on record, detections range from October 29, 2003 to August 12, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 160 of 160 results | Jun 15, 2004 | Aug 19, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 102 of 160 results | Jun 15, 2004 | Aug 19, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 77 of 77 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 75 of 75 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 59 of 75 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 56 of 75 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 42 of 75 results | Apr 27, 2005 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 40 of 75 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 31 of 36 results | Mar 12, 2012 | Aug 17, 2015 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 21 results | Aug 23, 2004 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 17 of 54 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 16 of 16 results | Sep 24, 2019 | Mar 27, 2023 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 15 of 54 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity 4100 | Radionuclide | 14 of 14 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Mar 19, 2010 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 14 results | Oct 29, 2003 | Mar 31, 2004 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 16 results | Sep 11, 2007 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 13 of 54 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 13 of 18 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Jan 16, 2013 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 16 results | Sep 17, 2013 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon & U 4000 | Radionuclide | 9 of 14 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Mar 19, 2010 |
| Cyanide 1024 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 72 results | Apr 27, 2005 | Jul 10, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 20 results | Sep 11, 2007 | Jul 30, 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 16 results | Jul 1, 2024 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 16 results | Sep 17, 2013 | Jul 1, 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 168 results | Mar 7, 2023 | Mar 7, 2023 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 168 results | Mar 7, 2023 | Mar 7, 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Oct 27, 2020 | Oct 27, 2020 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 168 results | Aug 7, 2006 | Aug 7, 2006 |
| Thallium, Total 1085 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 75 results | Apr 27, 2005 | Apr 27, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 501–510 of 710 samples, newest first — collected July 14, 2010 to August 17, 2010. The summary above covers all 710.
27 results from the 10 samples listed here: 15 detected, 12 not detected. Across the whole record it is 819 of 3,828. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.2326 mg/l , sample collected Aug 17, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Aug 17, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1435 mg/l , sample collected Aug 17, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 17, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0227 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0869 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0027 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0077 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0621 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1579 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0033 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0453 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0037 mg/l , sample collected Aug 16, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.41 ug/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.41 ug/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-153PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2326 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0007 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-152PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1435 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100819-041PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0227 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-169PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0869 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0027 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-163PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0077 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-162PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0621 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-160PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1579 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0033 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-154PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0453 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0037 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100715-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.41 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.41 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100715-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).