Skip to main content

Active , MS0760044 , Washington County

Delta Branch Experiment Sta

Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Population served
225
Population type
Non-Transient
Federal type
Non-Transient Non-Community (NTNC)
State type
Non-Transient, Non-Community (NTNC)
Water source, what the sources mean
Ground water 1 active of 1 on record
Service connections
1
Buys water from
None on record
Activity date
Not recorded

Who to contact

Gore, Jeff, Head
Contact types
Administrative Contact, Owner
Address
P O Box 197, Stoneville MS 38776
Jones, BradleyContact details not published for Jones, Bradley
Contact type
Designated Operator

No phone number, email address or postal address is published for this contact type; contact details are published only for an Administrative Contact or Owner.

Where the water comes from

Source facilities for Delta Branch Experiment Sta
FacilityName TypeStatus
WL001 Well WL001 Well Active

  • Well WL001

    Type
    Well
    Status
    Active

Who it serves

Serves one service area:

  • OTHER NON-TRANSIENT AREA
    Type of service area
    Non-Transient
Service connections by type and metering
Service connection typeMetering Connections
Combined UN (Unknown) 1

Operates year round.

This page shows only the operating periods in effect on September 25, 2026.

Compliance record

16 violations are listed below — validated and not in a violation group. Every validated violation.

Please note: some of these violations may have been resolved and/or returned to compliance.

Each violation below links to the enforcement actions the agency has recorded against it.

Violations on record for Delta Branch Experiment Sta.
Fiscal year Violation Analyte Category Determined
2025 LSL Inventory-Initial, 14229 Lead and Copper Rule Revisions Treatment Technique Feb 26, 2025
2025 LSL Reporting-Initial, 14230 Lead and Copper Rule Revisions Reporting Feb 26, 2025
2009 MCL, Average, 14109 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Dec 10, 2008
2008 MCL, Average, 11608 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level Apr 25, 2008
2008 MCL, Average, 11708 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Apr 25, 2008
2008 MCL, Average, 11808 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level Apr 25, 2008
2008 MCL, Average, 11908 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Apr 25, 2008
2008 MCL, Average, 11308 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Oct 3, 2007
2008 MCL, Average, 11408 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Oct 3, 2007
2006 MCL, Average, 10606 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
2006 MCL, Average, 10706 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
2006 MCL, Average, 10806 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
2007 MCL, Average, 11007 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
2007 MCL, Average, 11107 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
2007 MCL, Average, 11207 TTHM Maximum Contaminant Level Jul 23, 2007
1991 MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10591 Coliform (TCR) Maximum Contaminant Level May 31, 1991

  • LSL Inventory-Initial, 14229

    Determined
    Feb 26, 2025
    Category
    Treatment Technique
    Analyte
    Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
    Fiscal year
    2025

  • LSL Reporting-Initial, 14230

    Determined
    Feb 26, 2025
    Category
    Reporting
    Analyte
    Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
    Fiscal year
    2025

  • MCL, Average, 14109

    Determined
    Dec 10, 2008
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2009

  • MCL, Average, 11608

    Determined
    Apr 25, 2008
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 11708

    Determined
    Apr 25, 2008
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 11808

    Determined
    Apr 25, 2008
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 11908

    Determined
    Apr 25, 2008
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 11308

    Determined
    Oct 3, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 11408

    Determined
    Oct 3, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2008

  • MCL, Average, 10606

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2006

  • MCL, Average, 10706

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2006

  • MCL, Average, 10806

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2006

  • MCL, Average, 11007

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2007

  • MCL, Average, 11107

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2007

  • MCL, Average, 11207

    Determined
    Jul 23, 2007
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    TTHM
    Fiscal year
    2007

  • MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10591

    Determined
    May 31, 1991
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Coliform (TCR)
    Fiscal year
    1991

What a violation is. Violations are issued for a public water system when there is a failure to meet certain state/region or federal drinking water regulations.

  • Monitoring — A MON violation is a violation of a monitoring requirement or a reporting requirement associated with the monitoring. A monitoring violation occurs when a public water system owner does not collect a required sample. A reporting violation occurs when a public water system owner does not report the result(s) to the state from a sample that was collected. When a public water system's owner does not collect a required sample, the violation is often referred to as a monitoring and reporting violation.
  • Reporting — A RPT violation occurs when public water system owners fail to report certain information. The RPT category does not include the failure to report analytical results, which falls under the MON category.
  • Public Notice — A PN violation occurs when a public water system owner does not notify the public about another violation in a timely or appropriate fashion.
  • Maximum Contaminant Level — An MCL violation means a contaminant has been detected above maximum contaminant level consistently in drinking water. MCL is the highest level of contamination that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows in drinking water. MCLs ensure that drinking water does not pose a short-term or long-term health risk.
  • Treatment Technique — A TT violation occurs when a public water system owner fails to apply a prescribed treatment technique by the allotted time. Actions that are classified as treatment techniques are broad. Examples of TT violations include: failure to employ a certified operator, inadequate removal of organic materials from raw water.

These definitions are quoted from the help text published with these pages.

This site shows what the agency publishes to the public. Records the agency holds but does not publish will not appear here, however complete this rebuild becomes.

Source. Mississippi State Department of Health, SDWIS/STATE, read when this page was built. What this site does and does not cover.

Not published here yet

  • Consumer Confidence Report generation, which the agency's application produces as a downloadable report
  • The Standardized Monitoring Framework spreadsheet the agency offers for download from a system's page

The agency publishes these; this rebuild does not carry them yet. Find them in Drinking Water Watch.