Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0770002 ·, Clara Water Association

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 871–880 of 1,031 samples, newest first — collected October 27, 2009 to March 29, 2010. The summary above covers all 1,031.

54 results from the 10 samples listed here: 28 detected, 26 not detected. Across the whole record it is 1,454 of 3,338. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Mar 29, 2010

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100331-021PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.9942 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001 mg/l

• Collected

  Mar 29, 2010

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100331-016PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.1954 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0044 mg/l

• Collected

  Mar 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF104 Treatment Plant TF104

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100302-013IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.011457 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Mar 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF103 Treatment Plant T103

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100302-012IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.011817 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Nov 6, 2009

  Sampling point

  WL004 Well WL004

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091110-001PC

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    4.08 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    Not detected below 2.5 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.457 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.457 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.047 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    2.88 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    11.3 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    Not detected below 2.5 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    60 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    19 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Color 1905 EPA method 2120B

    Result

    20 units The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    18.9 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    10.9 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Iron, Field Result FEFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    0.87 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    17.4 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    6.7 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Oct 27, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091028-037PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.2363 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Oct 27, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091028-036PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0482 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0026 mg/l

• Collected

  Oct 27, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091028-027PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1867 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0007 mg/l

• Collected

  Oct 27, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091028-026PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.7079 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Oct 27, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  091028-025PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1563 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).