This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0790035 , Old River Water Assn- Fords Creek
11 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 60 samples on record.
The other 2 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 60 samples on record, detections range from September 24, 2008 to August 27, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 45 of 45 results | Sep 25, 2008 | Aug 27, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 36 of 45 results | Sep 25, 2008 | Aug 27, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 7 results | Sep 24, 2008 | Mar 27, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 8 results | Sep 24, 2008 | Oct 3, 2022 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 6 results | Sep 3, 2009 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 6 results | Sep 3, 2009 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Jul 14, 2014 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Aug 10, 2011 | Jul 14, 2014 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Aug 10, 2011 | Jul 14, 2014 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Jul 14, 2014 | Jul 14, 2014 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Sep 3, 2009 | Sep 3, 2009 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 51–60 of 60 samples, newest first — collected September 24, 2008 to October 23, 2008. The summary above covers all 60.
27 results from the 10 samples listed here: 18 detected, 9 not detected. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0078 mg/l , sample collected Oct 23, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Oct 23, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0713 mg/l , sample collected Oct 22, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Oct 22, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0171 mg/l , sample collected Oct 22, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Oct 22, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1217 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0044 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0289 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0022 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0163 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0189 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0019 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0156 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Sep 25, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Oct 23, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081024-027PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0078 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 22, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081024-035PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0713 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 22, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081024-026PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0171 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080930-015PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1217 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0044 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080930-009PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0289 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0022 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080930-008PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0163 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080930-007PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0189 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0019 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080930-006PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0156 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 24, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080925-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Sep 24, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080925-006HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).