Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0810015 ·, Billys Creek Rural W/A

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 211–220 of 264 samples, newest first — collected September 17, 2007 to August 3, 2010. The summary above covers all 264.

58 results from the 10 samples listed here: 25 detected, 33 not detected. Across the whole record it is 287 of 1,776. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Aug 3, 2010

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100804-012TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    12.7 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    9.39 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    4.76 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    26.85 ug/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  May 12, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100513-039IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.009042 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.00225 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    0.124 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001401 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  May 12, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100513-015CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  May 7, 2010

  Sampling point

  WL002 Well W002

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100510-001PC

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.82 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    5.297 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    0.127 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.428 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.012 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.11 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    84.4 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    0.162 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    193 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    2.63 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Color 1905 EPA method 2120B

    Result

    40 units The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    6.1 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    173 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Iron, Field Result FEFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    79.4 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    8.4 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Jun 8, 2009

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090609-029NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 8, 2009

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090609-013NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Dec 1, 2008

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  081202-043NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Dec 1, 2008

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  081202-042NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 17, 2007

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070918-027HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

• Collected

  Sep 17, 2007

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  070918-002TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Routine (10).