Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0810016 ·, Enid Lake Estates

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 61–70 of 107 samples, newest first — collected April 26, 2010 to June 16, 2011. The summary above covers all 107.

63 results from the 10 samples listed here: 26 detected, 37 not detected. Across the whole record it is 122 of 713. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Jun 16, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110617-165PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0045 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 16, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110617-164PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0076 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 16, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110617-163PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1051 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 16, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110617-149PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0132 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Apr 13, 2011

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110414-013NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.75 mg/l

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.75 mg/l

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Oct 6, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  101007-007NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.75 mg/l

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.75 mg/l

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 20, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100721-011VO

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

  • Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit

• Collected

  May 19, 2010

  Sampling point

  WL001 Well W001

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100521-006PC

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    3.58 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    7.42 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.41 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.458 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    11.1 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    1.21 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    42 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    48 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    14.8 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    28 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    10.8 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    6.1 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  May 12, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100513-038IN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.032007 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.000701 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001717 mg/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Apr 26, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100427-032CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).