This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0060006 , City of Cleveland
20 of the 60 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 874 samples on record.
The other 40 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 874 samples on record, detections range from October 26, 1992 to June 25, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 504 of 517 results | Oct 26, 1992 | Oct 28, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 246 of 517 results | Oct 26, 1992 | Oct 28, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 47 of 47 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 46 of 47 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 36 of 50 results | Mar 21, 2006 | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 35 of 47 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 27 of 30 results | Jul 1, 2009 | Apr 21, 2020 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 15 of 53 results | Apr 12, 2004 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 12 results | Sep 24, 2019 | Oct 10, 2024 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 47 results | Jan 12, 2004 | Mar 10, 2008 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 47 results | Feb 14, 2005 | May 3, 2022 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 35 results | Nov 15, 2006 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 30 results | Nov 13, 2013 | Jul 27, 2017 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 4 of 12 results | Sep 13, 2018 | Sep 13, 2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 3 of 4 results | Sep 13, 2018 | Sep 13, 2018 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 89 results | Jan 10, 2024 | Jan 10, 2024 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 43 results | Sep 29, 2011 | May 24, 2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 1 of 12 results | Sep 13, 2018 | Sep 13, 2018 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 1 of 12 results | Sep 13, 2018 | Sep 13, 2018 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 47 results | Feb 14, 2005 | Feb 14, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 431–440 of 874 samples, newest first — collected March 11, 2009 to July 14, 2009. The summary above covers all 874.
29 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 16 not detected. Across the whole record it is 1,013 of 3,252. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.2613 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.5315 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0005 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.4229 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0017 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0778 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1433 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2851 mg/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-028PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2613 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0013 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-027PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.5315 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0005 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-026PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.4229 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0017 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-025PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0778 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-024PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1433 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0013 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090715-023PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2851 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 1, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090702-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Jul 1, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090702-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Mar 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF104 Treatment Plant T104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090312-048NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 11, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF102 Treatment Plant T102
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090312-047NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).