This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0140024 , Mascot Planting Co
21 of the 51 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 82 samples on record.
The other 30 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 82 samples on record, detections range from November 2, 1993 to August 9, 2010. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 34 of 35 results | Nov 2, 1993 | Jul 8, 2008 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 29 of 35 results | Nov 2, 1993 | Jul 8, 2008 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 12 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Aug 9, 2010 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 12 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Aug 9, 2010 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 9 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 9 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 9 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Apr 9, 2002 | Mar 24, 2008 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 6 results | Apr 9, 2002 | Mar 24, 2008 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 9 results | Apr 28, 2008 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 9 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Nov 18, 2009 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 6 results | Jan 26, 2004 | Mar 24, 2008 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 6 results | Sep 22, 2003 | Jan 23, 2006 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Apr 9, 2002 | Mar 24, 2008 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Jan 26, 2004 | Jan 23, 2006 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Mar 1, 2005 | Mar 1, 2005 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 3 results | Sep 22, 2003 | Sep 22, 2003 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 1–10 of 82 samples, newest first — collected March 23, 2009 to August 9, 2010. The summary above covers all 82.
50 results from the 10 samples listed here: 25 detected, 25 not detected. Across the whole record it is 170 of 384. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 5.51 ug/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 5.26 ug/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 9.39 ug/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 16.4 ug/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 36.56 ug/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.005 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Nov 18, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 6.36 ug/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 4.08 ug/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 10.1 ug/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 16.4 ug/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 36.94 ug/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.005 mg/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.027 mg/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.006 mg/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.04 mg/l , sample collected Apr 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 23, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 23, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 23, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 9, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100810-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Aug 9, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100810-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- May 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100525-037NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Nov 18, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091119-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 5.51 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 5.26 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 9.39 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 16.4 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 36.56 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Nov 18, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091119-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.005 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Jul 21, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090722-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Jul 21, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090722-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Apr 30, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090501-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 6.36 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 4.08 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 10.1 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 16.4 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 36.94 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Apr 30, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090501-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.005 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.027 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.006 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.04 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Mar 23, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090324-062NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).