This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0360068 , Wellsgate
19 of the 61 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 253 samples on record.
The other 42 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 253 samples on record, detections range from October 27, 2003 to July 6, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 150 of 150 results | Sep 15, 2004 | Sep 17, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 79 of 150 results | Sep 15, 2004 | Sep 17, 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | May 19, 2004 | Jul 6, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | May 19, 2004 | Jul 6, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 9 results | Oct 27, 2003 | Feb 27, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 16 results | Aug 16, 2007 | May 9, 2024 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Jul 20, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Jul 20, 2012 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Jul 20, 2012 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 16 results | Sep 6, 2007 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 11 results | Sep 6, 2007 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Oct 1, 2021 | Feb 25, 2025 |
| Calcium 1016 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Oct 1, 2021 | Oct 1, 2021 |
| Chloride 1017 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Oct 1, 2021 | Oct 1, 2021 |
| Conductivity @ 25 C Umhos/CM 1064 | Water Quality | 1 of 1 result | Oct 1, 2021 | Oct 1, 2021 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Aug 22, 2019 | Aug 22, 2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Aug 22, 2019 | Aug 22, 2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Aug 22, 2019 | Aug 22, 2019 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 9 results | Mar 23, 2005 | Mar 23, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 161–170 of 253 samples, newest first — collected March 31, 2009 to October 14, 2009. The summary above covers all 253.
47 results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 37 not detected. Across the whole record it is 319 of 1,082. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0064 mg/l , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0118 mg/l , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0055 mg/l , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 14, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.56 mg/l , sample collected Apr 29, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| 0.56 mg/l , sample collected Apr 29, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 29, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0029 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0036 mg/l , sample collected Mar 31, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 31, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0051 mg/l , sample collected Mar 31, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 31, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091019-010PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0064 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091019-008PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0118 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091019-002PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0055 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 23, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090924-021TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Sep 23, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090924-021HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 23, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090724-012VO
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
-
- Collected
- Apr 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090430-061NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.56 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.56 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Apr 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090403-021PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0029 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 31, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090402-035PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0036 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 31, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090402-029PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0051 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).