Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0580006 , City of Pontotoc

28 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 554 samples on record.

The other 29 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 554 samples on record, detections range from November 3, 2003 to August 7, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for City of Pontotoc, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 158 of 158 results Jun 17, 2004 Aug 7, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 108 of 158 results Jun 17, 2004 Aug 7, 2025
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 60 of 60 results Nov 3, 2003 Mar 18, 2025
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 46 of 60 results Mar 15, 2004 Mar 18, 2025
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 34 of 60 results Nov 3, 2003 Oct 10, 2022
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 33 of 60 results Nov 3, 2003 Mar 18, 2025
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 33 of 60 results Nov 3, 2003 Oct 10, 2022
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 31 of 60 results Mar 15, 2004 Mar 18, 2025
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 25 of 30 results Mar 12, 2012 Oct 9, 2012
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 18 of 18 results Sep 23, 2019 Mar 4, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 15 of 20 results Sep 4, 2007 Nov 12, 2024
Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 Radionuclide 10 of 30 results Mar 12, 2012 Oct 9, 2012
Radium-226 4020 Radionuclide 10 of 30 results Mar 12, 2012 Oct 9, 2012
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 9 of 15 results Sep 29, 2020 Nov 12, 2024
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 9 of 12 results Nov 3, 2003 Mar 15, 2004
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 7 of 15 results Sep 29, 2020 Nov 12, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 6 of 19 results Sep 4, 2007 Nov 12, 2024
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 60 results Apr 11, 2005 Apr 11, 2005
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 4 of 15 results Sep 29, 2020 Nov 12, 2024
Cyanide 1024 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 60 results Feb 22, 2010 Oct 18, 2010
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 2 of 13 results Sep 29, 2020 Nov 12, 2024
Nitrite 1041 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 132 results Mar 21, 2012 May 9, 2016
Thallium, Total 1085 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 60 results Mar 15, 2004 Jan 25, 2010
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 1 of 15 results Nov 12, 2024 Nov 12, 2024
Antimony, Total 1074 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 60 results Dec 12, 2016 Dec 12, 2016
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Aug 26, 2013 Aug 26, 2013
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 132 results Mar 21, 2012 Mar 21, 2012
Nitrate 1040 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 132 results Mar 21, 2012 Mar 21, 2012

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 391–400 of 554 samples, newest first — collected January 25, 2010 to August 5, 2010. The summary above covers all 554.

40 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 27 not detected. Across the whole record it is 636 of 2,658. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Units in this table

Cyanide is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.

Chemical and radiological sample results for City of Pontotoc, every result from 391 to 400 of 554 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Aug 5, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100806-030PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0388 mg/l , sample collected Aug 5, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 5, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 28, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100629-011HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 28, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100629-011TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF106 Treatment Plant T106
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100223-020CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0771 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 22, 2010, sampling point TF106 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF103 Treatment Plant T103
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100223-019CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 22, 2010, sampling point TF103 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF105 Treatment Plant T105
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100223-012CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 22, 2010, sampling point TF105 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100223-010CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 22, 2010, sampling point TF102 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 22, 2010
Sampling point
TF104 Treatment Plant T104
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100223-001CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.036 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 22, 2010, sampling point TF104 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jan 25, 2010
Sampling point
TF104 Treatment Plant T104
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100126-070IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0083 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.2309 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.0315 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF104 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jan 25, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100126-065IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.1804 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 25, 2010, sampling point TF101 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

Routine (10).